STALIF TT™
OUS Surgeons
STALIF TT™
US Surgeons
STALIF C™
OUS Surgeons
INDICATIONS FEATURES & BENEFITS BIOMECHANICAL STUDY
STALIF C™
US Surgeons
SURGILIG™
OUS Surgeons
SURGILIG™
US Surgeons

STALIF C™ Biomechanical Study

"Most encouraging from these results is that anterior reconstruction alone using the No Profile™ STALIF C™ three screw device can reduce segmental motion to levels similar to that produced using conventional interbody arthrodesis augmented with anterior cervical plate fixation."1
1. A. Cappucino, MD; BW. Cunningham - Multi-Directional Flexibility Properties of the STALIF C™ versus Conventional Methods of Interbody Cervical Arthrodesis: An In-Vitro Calf Spine Model (Nov. 2007)

Destructive Extension Load to Failure Testing:

Maximum Moment at Failure (Nm):

Load to failure testing of the operative C4-C5  motion segments demonstrated no significant differences between the peak load at failure among the five treatment groups (p>0.05).  The Allograft augmented with anterior plate (33.21±8.29Nm) indicated the highest moment at failure among the treatments, however, was not statistically different from the other treatments (One Way ANOVA: F=0.83, p=0.583) (p>0.05).

Peak Moment at Failure (Nm):

No significant differences between the treatments (p>0.05). 
Error bars represent one standard deviation and significance is indicated at p<0.05.

Click on image to enlarge